![]() ![]() RSEA is a vibrant interdisciplinary area studies program designed to accommodate a wide range of interests and needs for graduate training in the languages, societies and cultures of East Asia. The full fellowship includes round-trip air fare from Asia, medical insurance, Harvard tuition and a stipend for living expenses. But because they happen to be located at nonprofit colleges, they’re not subject to the Department of Education regulations.This multi-year full fellowship covers the two-year master’s degree in Harvard’s Regional Studies – East Asia (RSEA) program. The same is true for most other master’s programs, law schools and more. Nobody tracks how much students borrow to attend these programs, or how much they earn after graduation. Many of them also charge hefty tuition and leave graduates with substantial debt. There are hundreds of master’s of fine arts programs out there, training people for careers as writers, actors and artists. It was evaluated in the first place only because its two-year graduate degree was classified as a “certificate,” not a traditional master’s degree. Institute at Harvard, which was also caught by a quirk in the regulation. Presumably, that was the case with the A.R.T. So while some failing programs are simply bad programs, providing slipshod training and credentials with little value in the labor market, others may be very good, but are just too expensive. Program graduates usually leave with little debt and consistently earn salaries of $30,000 to $50,000 a year. field is carefully monitored by health care regulators and the nursing profession itself. That’s because most are offered at affordable prices by public community colleges, and the L.P.N. Not one of them failed the debt-to-earnings-ratio test. The Department of Education regulations were used to evaluate over 600 licensed practical nursing programs. But it can be very hard for the average consumer to know the difference beforehand. Sure, there are good programs in all of these fields, including some offered by for-profit schools. What these programs have in common is a combination of marketing appeal to young people - design video games for a living! - and little or no outside pressure to ensure that the education is both of high quality and leads to jobs that pay enough to finance the cost of student loans. Other programs that crop up frequently on the failing list include cosmetology and barbering, acupuncture and massage therapy, criminal justice studies and low-level jobs in health care fields. The for-profit Art Institutes programs that failed the federal test trained students in fields including commercial photography, video production, radio broadcasting, culinary arts, interior decorating and video game design. The Department of Education recently shut down the accrediting organization that keeps The Art Institutes and many other for-profits eligible for federal aid. They are a for-profit chain - with no relation to the Harvard program - that expanded rapidly across the United States in the 2000s only to suffer in recent years from a string of problems, including shrinking enrollment, multiple closed campuses, lawsuits, government investigations and financial woes. The government list of failing programs also includes numerous Art Institutes schools. This temporary pause in enrollment will be used to “evaluate the program and undertake vital strategic planning to address, among other things, student funding mechanisms.” Institute will not be enrolling any new students this fall, said David Cameron, a spokesman from Harvard. Institute graduate has to pay 44 percent of discretionary income just to make the minimum loan payment.īecause the regulations put the program’s federal aid eligibility at risk, the A.R.T. And because it’s a graduate program, students can also borrow the full cost of their living expenses from the federal government, regardless of their credit history.Īfter accounting for basic living expenses, the average Harvard A.R.T. The two-year tuition total is around $63,000. ![]() The problem, from a regulatory standpoint, is that they borrow a lot of money to obtain the degree - over $78,000 on average, according to the university. It’s a small program, admitting about two dozen students each year into “a full-time, two-year program of graduate study in acting, dramaturgy or voice pedagogy.” On average, graduates earn about $36,000 per year. Harvard’s inclusion suggests it might make sense to expand the rules to include nonprofit programs with similar problems. Republican members of Congress and people working with the incoming Trump administration have called for rolling back the for-profit college regulations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |